Page 296 |
Previous | 296 of 356 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
population were identified in , a comparison of the overaU needs which would be created by the five "'lill he 'l"the eSSen1aaJ data presented in Table 31 that about the same l1um,ber of students-· 2700 to 2900 would become eligible for transportation under three plans. In pl:UlS K-4 and 2-6P the nUlllber of eligible students would increase to about 3800 5200, respectively. It should be repeated that all these busing projections are overstated to the extent that aU students eligible wiU not become actual bus riders, as is the case with the current school population. Plan K-4 Plan K-3 Plan 4-5 Plan K-·1P Plan 2-6P TABLE 31 NUMBER OF STUDENTS REASSIGNED TO DH?I~ERENT SCHOOL AND ADDED TO BtJS TRANSPORTATION UNDER EACH OI<~ THE FIVE PLANS 15~782 3,797 13~881 2,869 13,185 2,892 6,761 5,152 5.351 2,678 24.1 20.7 21.9 76,2 50.0 Plan K-4'P and Plan 2-6P would be less efficient than the others in terms of increased busing. Much larger proportions of the students reassigned under these plans would be added to the bused population than under the other plans; in fact, proportions two to three times as large. Plan Ii-4P would add substantially more students to busing mainly because of those students who would attend the five G5-6 centers under this plan. Nearly 1800 students would become eligible for busing because of this plan feature. Cost Requirementj' Tbe main financial requirenlents for the five alternatives are, of cours,e, additional costs for pupil transportation and school facilities. Table 32 summarizes the estimated transportation costs of each of the plans under capital outlay and annual operating cost categories. Complete details concerning the bases on which these estimates were calculated appear in Item 16 of the 279
Object Description
Title | Fort Wayne community schools: a survey report |
Creator | George Peabody College for Teachers. Office of Educational Services |
Topic | Education |
Subject |
Schools--Indiana--Fort Wayne School integration--Indiana--Fort Wayne |
Geographical Coverage | Fort Wayne, Indiana |
Date of Original | 1975 |
Time Period | 1900-1999 |
Source | Print version: George Peabody College for Teachers. Office of Educational Services. Fort Wayne community schools: a survey report. (Nashville, Tenn.: Office of Educational Services, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1975), 338 p. |
Additional Availability | Print version might be available at IPFW Helmke Library. See online catalog. |
Rights | Copyright Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2006- . All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without permission. For information regarding reproduction and use see: http://cdm16776.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/about/collection/p16776coll1/ |
Date Digitally Created | April 17 2012 |
Digital Publisher | Walter E. Helmke Library, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne |
Digitization Specifications | This pdf file was derived from black and white 400 dpi, 1-bit and color 300 dpi, 24-bit uncompressed TIFF images that were scanned from the originals using a Konica Minolta PS5000C scanner with Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Professional scanning software. |
Content Type | Text |
Digital Format | text/pdf |
Collection | Fort Wayne Area Government Information |
Identifier | 30000101350159 |
File Name | 30000101350159.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 296 |
Transcript | population were identified in , a comparison of the overaU needs which would be created by the five "'lill he 'l"the eSSen1aaJ data presented in Table 31 that about the same l1um,ber of students-· 2700 to 2900 would become eligible for transportation under three plans. In pl:UlS K-4 and 2-6P the nUlllber of eligible students would increase to about 3800 5200, respectively. It should be repeated that all these busing projections are overstated to the extent that aU students eligible wiU not become actual bus riders, as is the case with the current school population. Plan K-4 Plan K-3 Plan 4-5 Plan K-·1P Plan 2-6P TABLE 31 NUMBER OF STUDENTS REASSIGNED TO DH?I~ERENT SCHOOL AND ADDED TO BtJS TRANSPORTATION UNDER EACH OI<~ THE FIVE PLANS 15~782 3,797 13~881 2,869 13,185 2,892 6,761 5,152 5.351 2,678 24.1 20.7 21.9 76,2 50.0 Plan K-4'P and Plan 2-6P would be less efficient than the others in terms of increased busing. Much larger proportions of the students reassigned under these plans would be added to the bused population than under the other plans; in fact, proportions two to three times as large. Plan Ii-4P would add substantially more students to busing mainly because of those students who would attend the five G5-6 centers under this plan. Nearly 1800 students would become eligible for busing because of this plan feature. Cost Requirementj' Tbe main financial requirenlents for the five alternatives are, of cours,e, additional costs for pupil transportation and school facilities. Table 32 summarizes the estimated transportation costs of each of the plans under capital outlay and annual operating cost categories. Complete details concerning the bases on which these estimates were calculated appear in Item 16 of the 279 |