Page 138 |
Previous | 138 of 247 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
III/57 Due to the marty variables involved, no definite values can be given for the efficiency of BOD and suspended solids reduction to be expected from an oxidation pond. The principal advantage of an oxidation pond as a tertiary treatment device is its flexibility. In addition to polishing secondary effluent, the pond may he used for the detention and partial treatment of storm '{vater runoff and/or se\vage bypassed around all or parts of the preceding treatment processes. SUlfHARY The several processes discussed in this section are summarized in Table 111/14. 1~e data given for process capability and cost are derived for the most part from various published reports and are only approximate. In many cases an indivi.dual process may be designed for any desired efficiency within a wide range of capability. The associated costs will then be directly affected by the performance level selected by the designer. Accurate data for capability and cost of a specific process can be ob t-ained only -from bench or pilot scale evaluations and/or detailed design studies.
Object Description
Title | Master plan for sewers (pt. 3) |
Alternative Title | Water pollution control plant |
Contributor |
Henry B. Steeg & Associates Fort Wayne (Ind.). Board of Public Works |
Topic | Public Utilities |
Subject | Sewage disposal--Indiana--Fort Wayne |
Geographical Coverage | Fort Wayne, Indiana |
Date of Original | January 1972 |
Time Period | 1900-1999 |
Source | Print version: Master plan for sewers. Pt. 3: Water pollution control plant. (Indianapolis, Ind.: Henry B. Steeg & Associates, 1972), 1 v. |
Additional Availability | Print version might be available at IPFW Helmke Library. See online catalog. |
Relation | Third of three parts of Master plan for sewer. Pt. 1, Relief sewers, digital barcode is 30000126499916; Pt. 2, Sanitary sewers, digital barcode is 30000126499924; |
Rights | Copyright Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2006- . All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without permission. For information regarding reproduction and use see: http://cdm16776.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/about/collection/p16776coll1/ |
Date Digitally Created | April 17 2012 |
Digital Publisher | Walter E. Helmke Library, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne |
Digitization Specifications | This pdf file was derived from 400 dpi, 1-bit, uncompressed TIFF images that were scanned from the originals using a Fujitsu 5750C scanner with Adobe Acrobat 9.0 Professional scanning software, black and white configuration. |
Content Type | Text |
Digital Format | text/pdf |
Collection | Fort Wayne Area Government Information |
Identifier | 30000126499932 |
File Name | 30000126499932.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 138 |
Transcript | III/57 Due to the marty variables involved, no definite values can be given for the efficiency of BOD and suspended solids reduction to be expected from an oxidation pond. The principal advantage of an oxidation pond as a tertiary treatment device is its flexibility. In addition to polishing secondary effluent, the pond may he used for the detention and partial treatment of storm '{vater runoff and/or se\vage bypassed around all or parts of the preceding treatment processes. SUlfHARY The several processes discussed in this section are summarized in Table 111/14. 1~e data given for process capability and cost are derived for the most part from various published reports and are only approximate. In many cases an indivi.dual process may be designed for any desired efficiency within a wide range of capability. The associated costs will then be directly affected by the performance level selected by the designer. Accurate data for capability and cost of a specific process can be ob t-ained only -from bench or pilot scale evaluations and/or detailed design studies. |