Page 133 |
Previous | 133 of 145 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
n
U
n u
o
fl
U
n u
o
(J
fl U
[]
n 1. \ u
r ( i
U
f.!.!i U
U·
;f; ----·
I~ 1
fl. i U
New Haven CIldlllber of Comuicrce
NEW I-IAVEN, INDIANA
46:-174
July 12, 1976
Mr. Harold Fancher, Hea.ring Officer
Indiana State High1vay Commission
State Office Building
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Re: Northeast Leg of Fort Wayne By-Pass
Dear Mr. Fancher:
Un for tuna tely, due to an unusua.lly heavy personal schedule,
I was not aware of the hearing in Leo on this section of the
By-Pass. This, of course, is a matter of vita.l concern to us
in New Haven, as well as all people in the northeast section of
the state.
"{Ie are in very strong support of this By-Pass and would
like to officially go on record as endorsing the selection of
a route as far east of New Haven as is possible.
The information I received ,vas that the meeting was not
very \vell attended. I do not believe this "Nas because of a
lack of interest, but rather that people were not aware the
meeting was being held. I, therefore, would like to request
that consideration be given to another meeting and that it be
held in New Haven.
Thank you for your consideration.
KM:jm
., , ..... ,. " . . . ~ "'
':.~ !' ·'.t :.; ....... , ".!- . ~.. :: -- .,
~:; ~~',~"L ~ i : ~;: ;.:~ ~ ~ ."{: (:.: :,," ..
~
~ : "~.:.' r~/G .~
.. ", I"I) \r,T:.. j11f'UWltV .7'1.;',
.~ ,.,l. -'I,·, I : .. 111~i ./ .. 1'\, '.:'
;,,. .. ~.. .. .L',' ·::!lrJ or rl.r\m,~:;"'l
··:·~:~··~·y:·, ":.: . .' .. , ,,::.~~' :-,::~' ... ,":' .... ~>,:: ... ~.,
'-
Object Description
| Title | Northeast by-pass around Fort Wayne from U.S. 30 to I-69 |
| Alternative Title | Corridor study report |
| Contributor | Indiana. State Highway Commission (1961-1981) |
| Topic | Transportation, Highways |
| Subject |
Highway bypasses--Indiana--Fort Wayne Highway bypasses--Indiana--Allen County |
| Geographical Coverage |
Fort Wayne, Indiana Allen County, Indiana |
| Date of Original | 1976 |
| Time Period | 1900-1999 |
| Source | Print version: Northeast by-pass around Fort Wayne from U.S. 30 to I-69. (Indianapolis, Ind.: Indiana State Highway Commission, 1976?), 136 p. |
| Additional Availability | Print version might be available at IPFW Helmke Library. See online catalog. |
| Rights | Copyright Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2006- . All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without permission. For information regarding reproduction and use see: http://cdm16776.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/about/collection/p16776coll1/ |
| Date Digitally Created | April 17 2012 |
| Digital Publisher | Walter E. Helmke Library, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne |
| Digitization Specifications | This pdf file was derived from black and white 400 dpi, 1-bit and color 300 dpi, 24-bit uncompressed TIFF images that were scanned from the originals using Fujitsu M4097D and 5750C scanners with Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Professional scanning software. |
| Content Type | Text |
| Digital Format | text/pdf |
| Collection | Fort Wayne Area Government Information |
| Identifier | 30000101348062 |
| File Name | 30000101348062.pdf |
Description
| Title | Page 133 |
| Transcript | n U n u o fl U n u o (J fl U [] n 1. \ u r ( i U f.!.!i U U· ;f; ----· I~ 1 fl. i U New Haven CIldlllber of Comuicrce NEW I-IAVEN, INDIANA 46:-174 July 12, 1976 Mr. Harold Fancher, Hea.ring Officer Indiana State High1vay Commission State Office Building Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Re: Northeast Leg of Fort Wayne By-Pass Dear Mr. Fancher: Un for tuna tely, due to an unusua.lly heavy personal schedule, I was not aware of the hearing in Leo on this section of the By-Pass. This, of course, is a matter of vita.l concern to us in New Haven, as well as all people in the northeast section of the state. "{Ie are in very strong support of this By-Pass and would like to officially go on record as endorsing the selection of a route as far east of New Haven as is possible. The information I received ,vas that the meeting was not very \vell attended. I do not believe this "Nas because of a lack of interest, but rather that people were not aware the meeting was being held. I, therefore, would like to request that consideration be given to another meeting and that it be held in New Haven. Thank you for your consideration. KM:jm ., , ..... ,. " . . . ~ "' ':.~ !' ·'.t :.; ....... , ".!- . ~.. :: -- ., ~:; ~~',~"L ~ i : ~;: ;.:~ ~ ~ ."{: (:.: :,," .. ~ ~ : "~.:.' r~/G .~ .. ", I"I) \r,T:.. j11f'UWltV .7'1.;', .~ ,.,l. -'I,·, I : .. 111~i ./ .. 1'\, '.:' ;,,. .. ~.. .. .L',' ·::!lrJ or rl.r\m,~:;"'l ··:·~:~··~·y:·, ":.: . .' .. , ,,::.~~' :-,::~' ... ,":' .... ~>,:: ... ~., '- |
